Double Commander

Official forum
It is currently Fri Jul 01, 2016 11:56 am

All times are UTC + 3 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 11:56 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:08 pm
Posts: 3282
Due to the upgrade SourceForge engine has been changed Subversion repository address.
New subversion repository address can be found here.
You can switch to new repository by a fresh checkout using the new repository location.

_________________
Arch Linux
Windows 10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 2:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 27
Following you link leads to a page with Branches, Tags and Trunk - no nightly builds may be found.

Where are they hidden now?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 4:30 pm
Posts: 27
OK, found it:

http://doublecmd.sourceforge.net/site/e ... shots.html

Happy holidays to all!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 10:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:00 pm
Posts: 5
Hi, where can I find snapshot for Windows? I see only linux version.

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 8:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:51 am
Posts: 111
Wiki: Development versions


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 7:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:00 pm
Posts: 5
O.K.

So right link is
http://doublecmd.xe0.ru/
not
http://doublecmd.sourceforge.net/site/e ... shots.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2013 8:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:51 am
Posts: 111
Check now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:26 pm
Posts: 8
@Developers: Sorry for the question but have you considered using git as your version control system? I am confident it would speed up and distribute the development work to more people. Please check it out. And of course there is github.com which makes using git even more awesome.

Please consider switching. I am importing the svn repo to git right now. Let me know what you think about it …
Edit: I have set up a mirror of the svn on github: https://github.com/ypid/doublecmd.

However your decision will be. Double Commander is awesome. Thank you some much for creating it.


Last edited by ypid on Fri May 01, 2015 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 9:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:08 pm
Posts: 3282
I do not see any big advantages of git in our case. I don't think it would change anything in development.

_________________
Arch Linux
Windows 10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 7:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:11 pm
Posts: 27
ypid, I just must say that I agree with you: svn is so awful comparing to mercurial or git. I hate svn for the every-day dilemma: should I commit now or should I test or improve added functionality?. I also don't like it for ugly support of ignoring files (single .hgignore/.gitignore file is much more clear and compact than svn's approach)

And, of course, general design of mercurial/git (save changesets, not revisions) is superior to svn in case of branching. Here, I must note that we haven't many developers so this one is probably not crucial (at least for now). BUT, at the other side, using svn probably repels new developers from this project, as it repelled personally me. My short story: I'm really, really amazed by existing functionality of DC, it is purely life-changing project for me, because now I can use Linux with powerful file manager just like Total Commander. But, I feel lack of some features, so I wanted to participate. When I was figuring out how to develop DC, I got two disappointments: firstly, I personally don't like pascal (but Alex does, and, after all, it is a matter of taste). And secondly, ugly svn! I can't agree that it is matter of taste too; svn has no advantages (that I'm aware of) comparing to mercurial/git, but it has several huge disadvantages. And I decided: no, maybe later.

Well, after some time, I participated anyway, in the client/server and command line params part, as you might see in recent commits log. But, the fact is that svn is repellently painful.

As far as I see, Alex won't change it, but anyway, I wanted to say that I agree: svn sucks. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 3:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:33 am
Posts: 3
I wanted to propose a consideration of switching to Git and I have found that thread.

In my opinion switching to Git (and GitHub) could involve more people into the projects. I would not expect an incredible amount of external contribution, but with GitHub even small things like fixing a type can be done within a browser (create w pull request) and you can also using a browser merge it into a master branch (a trunk) with one just click. I bet most of those people give up having a perspective to work with patches and SVN.

To not to be groundless there is a case study of PIT - a mutation testing tools for Java. It was quite popular one man project developed for a few years. After a migration to GitHub the first contributions were within a week (and not fixing a typo, but real code enhancements) and after a year there are over 10 external contributors with non trivial changes. Java is quite more popular than Pascal nowadays, but I would expect some contribution into so useful (thanks @Alex2000!) project like Double Commander anyway.

The migration from SVN to Git can be done with the whole history, authors and branches (as @dimonomid already did). A quick introduction to GitHub workflow (how to work with pull requests) and a guide for people switching from SVN to Git.

Marcin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2015 12:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:26 pm
Posts: 8
@dimonomid, git can handle the svn backend and you as a developer can basicly ignroe svn. But this way things like ignore files would have to be maintained two times. I am also not fluent in Pascal but there is not much I would change as DC is already pretty awesome and when there is, the bug tracker has been a good starting point (big thanks to @Alexx2000 !).

As mentioned by @szpak you can start of pretty easy. You can either fork my git mirror of doublecmd or run
Code:
git svn clone svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/doublecmd/code/trunk doublecmd-code
. BTW. there are already several people which are interested in doublecmd on github (e.g. starred it).


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 3 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Get Double Commander at SourceForge.net. Fast, secure and Free Open Source software downloads